This research analyses the governance of the fast-burning crisis of the banking system and the slow-burning crisis of financial sustainability. It aims to identify the modes of governance and institutional assemblages that condition it and establish which and how expert networks are positioned to drive policy innovation (or reinforce policy inertia) and generate increased legitimacy, as well as which ideas have become dominant in these networks. As the crisis experience has made amply clear, financial stability and fiscal viability of member states are closely – even dangerously – connected. Because of this link, they are together defined here as ‘financial sustainability’. In the European response to this twin banking and sovereign debt crises, including the European Semester, Banking Union, the European Stability Mechanism, Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure and the Fiscal Compact, issues of financial sector design, governance and supervision and fiscal policies are tightly linked and coordinated. The institutional architecture that has been erected to support these policies is complex, including the establishment of the European Stability Mechanism and the Fiscal Compact outside the legal framework of the EU. That has made governing the intersection between financial services policy (regulation and supervision of financial institutions) and monetary and fiscal policy for EU members highly complicated. Besides, policymakers and members of civil society overestimate the ability of regulation to banish financial instability by itself in an adverse macroeconomic context. In consequence, this research will investigate what institutional reforms (with their tensions and complementarities) are likely to pay a combined legitimacy and efficiency dividend in governing fast- and slow-burning crises.
For non-academic partners, this research is also the occasion to take a step back and explore the bigger conceptual framework defining the environment in which they operate. They expect the project to give them arguments for policy-makers (also at national level e.g. in the UK context) to tackle the root causes of the last crisis instead of fighting symptoms.
Banking Crisis and Financial Sustainability (WP2)
- Grey matter in shadow banking international organizations and expert strategies in global financial governance, by Cornel Ban, Leonard Seabrooke & Sarah Freitas
- Making sense of austerity, by Leonard Seabrooke and Rune Riisbjerg Thomsen
- Powering ideas through Expertise, by Leonard Seabrooke & Duncan Wigan
- The Finance Curse_Britain and the World Economy, by John Christensen, Nick Shaxson and Duncan Wigan
- The regulator’s conundrum. How financial reflexivity feeds arm’s‐length regulation, by Bart Stellinga and Daniel Mügge
On the news
From our non-academic partners
- Failing or likely to fail?
- New Finance Watch report : “Representation of the public interest in banking”
- Finance Watch Conference “Representation of Public Interest in Banking”
- Anti-tax, anti-regulation sirens already emerging after Brexit
- Podcast: Brexit, quantifying kleptocracy & why Panama Papers is tip of offshore iceberg
- Starting workshop (June 2015)
- Scientific workshop “Governing Financial Sustainability in Europe” (February 2017)